Statement I: Secondary succession is slower that primary succession.
Statement II: Primary succession begins in areas where some soil or sediment present but natural biotic communities have been destroyed by natural climaties or manmade.
Text Solution
Verified by ExpertsD
Statement I is incorrect: Secondary succession is actually faster than primary succession. Because soil or sediment is already present, plants can recolonise the area much more quickly than on bare, lifeless surfaces.
Statement II is incorrect: The description provided actually defines secondary succession, not primary succession. Primary succession begins in entirely lifeless areas (like bare rock or newly cooled lava) where no soil exists. Secondary succession is what happens in areas where a previous community was destroyed but the soil remains.
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Prepare Smarter with CGP Edu
Get practice questions, solutions, and test series in one place.
Write a Review
Share your experience with this question and solution.
Commentary
Send your comment, doubt, correction, or feedback to admin.
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems