Statement I: Food, firewood, fibre, medicinal importance are broadly utilitarian, argument to conserve biodiversity.
Statement II: Ecosystem services are the narrowly utilitarian argument to conserve biodiversity.
Text Solution
Verified by ExpertsD
Statement I: Food, firewood, fibre, and medicinal importance are narrowly utilitarian arguments, as they represent direct, quantifiable economic benefits derived from nature. Therefore, stating they are "broadly utilitarian" is incorrect.
Statement II: Ecosystem services (e.g., pollination, oxygen production) are the broadly utilitarian argument, as they represent indirect, essential benefits that are harder to quantify. Therefore, stating they are "narrowly utilitarian" is incorrect.
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Prepare Smarter with CGP Edu
Get practice questions, solutions, and test series in one place.
Write a Review
Share your experience with this question and solution.
Commentary
Send your comment, doubt, correction, or feedback to admin.
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems